
"We do not have any additional costs for Azure Backup."."There is a cost per terabyte for using this solution.".So, there is a double cost if we have to use Avamar in the cloud."
"Overall, its cost is better because the VMs are already there, and whatever you back up, there is only the additional cost of that storage, whereas if I have to use Avamar in Azure, a separate cost is there for the Avamar server, and in addition, whatever I take as a backup, there is a separate license with Avamar for that.
"It's around $10 to $15 per month per virtual machine, along with something extra based on the size of the data.". "The price should be cheaper, but it's affordable if you use the yearly subscription.". "Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis.". We would like Azure to increase the number of the possible file restorations." Azure must add this new feature." "Azure Backup's licensing model is very challenging because it doesn't give a clear picture." "There is a limitation of 99 files restores per day which means that we can't complete a huge file restore. It would be beneficial to shorten the time it takes." "The product could improve its performance." "I can’t use the solution to restore another native cloud solution. We need to allocate a longer period for complete data recovery to establish the environment again." "The only thing I would say that could be improved is the reporting." "While Azure Backup allows ingress data, the egress data is chargeable, which should be excluded." "The length of time it takes to restore is our main source of frustration. #Amazon cloud drive vs carbonite server backup full
Moreover, another drawback lies in the time it takes to test full data backup recovery.
Updating the connector from time to time can be challenging, and it could be made more transparent and straightforward for users. Additionally, automating the client updates and connector updates would be beneficial. "I believe more options could be available to understand better what's happening in the system.